For Christmas I received a fascinating gift from a buddy - my really own "best-selling" book.

"Tech-Splaining for Dummies" (excellent title) bears my name and my picture on its cover, and it has glowing evaluations.

Yet it was entirely written by AI, with a few easy triggers about me supplied by my good friend Janet.

It's an intriguing read, and extremely funny in parts. But it also meanders quite a lot, and is someplace between a self-help book and a stream of anecdotes.

It imitates my chatty design of writing, however it's likewise a bit repetitive, and extremely verbose. It might have surpassed Janet's prompts in collecting information about me.

Several sentences start "as a leading innovation journalist ..." - cringe - which could have been scraped from an online bio.

There's likewise a mysterious, repetitive hallucination in the form of my cat (I have no animals). And there's a metaphor on nearly every page - some more random than others.

There are dozens of business online offering AI-book composing services. My book was from BookByAnyone.

When I got in touch with the president Adir Mashiach, based in Israel, he told me he had actually offered around 150,000 customised books, generally in the US, considering that rotating from putting together AI-generated travel guides in June 2024.

A paperback copy of your own 240-page long best-seller costs ₤ 26. The company uses its own AI tools to create them, based on an open source big language model.

I'm not asking you to buy my book. Actually you can't - only Janet, who developed it, can buy any more copies.

There is presently no barrier to anyone producing one in any person's name, including celebrities - although Mr Mashiach says there are guardrails around abusive material. Each book includes a printed disclaimer specifying that it is fictional, developed by AI, akropolistravel.com and developed "exclusively to bring humour and pleasure".

Legally, sitiosecuador.com the copyright belongs to the company, however Mr Mashiach stresses that the product is intended as a "personalised gag present", and the books do not get sold even more.

He wants to broaden his variety, producing various categories such as sci-fi, and perhaps providing an autobiography service. It's developed to be a light-hearted kind of consumer AI - selling AI-generated goods to human clients.

It's also a bit frightening if, like me, you write for a living. Not least due to the fact that it probably took less than a minute to generate, and it does, certainly in some parts, sound much like me.

Musicians, authors, artists and stars worldwide have actually revealed alarm about their work being used to train generative AI tools that then produce comparable material based upon it.

"We must be clear, when we are talking about data here, we actually suggest human creators' life works," says Ed Newton Rex, creator of Fairly Trained, which campaigns for AI firms to regard developers' rights.

"This is books, this is short articles, this is photos. It's artworks. It's records ... The whole point of AI training is to discover how to do something and then do more like that."

In 2023 a song including AI-generated voices of Canadian vocalists Drake and The Weeknd went viral on social networks before being pulled from streaming platforms because it was not their work and they had not consented to it. It didn't stop the trying to choose it for a Grammy award. And even though the artists were fake, it was still extremely popular.

"I do not think using generative AI for imaginative purposes ought to be banned, but I do think that generative AI for these purposes that is trained on people's work without authorization need to be banned," Mr Newton Rex adds. "AI can be very powerful but let's construct it fairly and fairly."

OpenAI states Chinese competitors utilizing its work for their AI apps

DeepSeek: The Chinese AI app that has the world talking

China's DeepSeek AI shakes industry and damages America's swagger

In the UK some organisations - consisting of the BBC - have picked to block AI developers from trawling their online content for training purposes. Others have decided to work together - the Financial Times has actually partnered with ChatGPT developer OpenAI for example.

The UK government is considering an overhaul of the law that would allow AI developers to utilize developers' material on the web to assist develop their models, unless the rights holders pull out.

Ed Newton Rex explains this as "insanity".

He points out that AI can make advances in areas like defence, health care and logistics without trawling the work of authors, reporters and artists.

"All of these things work without going and changing copyright law and destroying the livelihoods of the nation's creatives," he argues.

Baroness Kidron, a crossbench peer in your house of Lords, is also highly against eliminating copyright law for AI.

"Creative industries are wealth creators, 2.4 million tasks and a great deal of joy," says the Baroness, who is also a consultant to the Institute for Ethics in AI at Oxford University.

"The government is undermining one of its finest performing industries on the unclear pledge of growth."

A government representative stated: "No relocation will be made up until we are definitely confident we have a practical plan that provides each of our goals: increased control for best holders to help them accredit their material, access to top quality material to train leading AI models in the UK, and more openness for ideal holders from AI designers."

Under the UK government's new AI strategy, a nationwide data library containing public data from a large range of sources will also be made available to AI scientists.

In the US the future of federal guidelines to control AI is now up in the air following President Trump's go back to the presidency.

In 2023 Biden signed an executive order that aimed to boost the safety of AI with, to name a few things, firms in the sector needed to share details of the functions of their systems with the US government before they are released.

But this has now been repealed by Trump. It stays to be seen what Trump will do instead, but he is said to want the AI sector to deal with less policy.

This comes as a variety of suits versus AI firms, and particularly against OpenAI, continue in the US. They have actually been taken out by everybody from the New York Times to authors, music labels, and even a comedian.

They declare that the AI firms broke the law when they took their material from the internet without their authorization, and used it to train their systems.

The AI business argue that their actions fall under "reasonable usage" and are therefore exempt. There are a number of elements which can make up reasonable usage - it's not a straight-forward meaning. But the AI sector is under increasing scrutiny over how it collects training data and whether it should be paying for it.

If this wasn't all enough to consider, Chinese AI firm DeepSeek has shaken the sector over the previous week. It ended up being one of the most downloaded totally free app on Apple's US App Store.

DeepSeek claims that it developed its technology for a portion of the rate of the likes of OpenAI. Its success has actually raised security issues in the US, and threatens American's current supremacy of the sector.

When it comes to me and a profession as an author, I think that at the minute, if I really want a "bestseller" I'll still have to write it myself. If anything, Tech-Splaining for Dummies highlights the present weakness in generative AI tools for larger jobs. It is full of errors and hallucinations, and it can be quite tough to read in parts since it's so long-winded.

But provided how rapidly the tech is evolving, I'm not sure for how long I can remain confident that my considerably slower human writing and modifying abilities, are better.

Register for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the biggest developments in global technology, with analysis from BBC correspondents around the globe.

Outside the UK? Register here.