Secure.gov websites use HTTPS A lock (Lock Locked padlock) or https:// suggests you've safely connected to the.gov site. Share sensitive details only on authorities, protected sites.
askmoney.com
- About - The Chief law officer - Organizational Chart

• Budget & Performance
• History
• Privacy Program
  bloglines.com
  - Press Releases
• Speeches
• Videos
• Photo Galleries
• Blogs
• Podcasts
  
  - Guidance Documents
• Forms
• Publications
• Information for Victims in Large Cases
• Justice Manual
• Business and Contracts
  
  - Why Justice?
• Benefits
• DOJ Vacancies
• Legal Careers at DOJ
  
  Utilities
  
  - About About
  
  Our Work
  
  - Contact the Division Contact the Division
  
  Report an Offense
  
  - Cases and Matters
• Press Room Press Room
  
  Videos
  
  Publications
  
  - Employment Opportunities Employment Opportunities
  
  Experienced Professionals
  
  Attorney general of the United States ´ s Honors Program
  
  Volunteer and Paid Student Internship Programs
  
  - Civil Liberty FOIA Civil Liberty FOIA
  
  Emmett Till Act/Cold Case Memoranda
  
  - En español
  
  - About - title=" About" About
• The Chief law officer
• Organizational Chart
• Budget & Performance
• History
• Privacy Program
  
  - title=" News" News
• Press Releases
• Speeches
• Videos - Photo Galleries
• Blogs
• Podcasts
  
  - title=" Guidance & Resources" Resources
• Guidance Documents
• Forms
• Publications
• Information for Victims in Large Cases
• Justice Manual
• Business and Contracts
  
  - Employment
• Why Justice?
• Benefits
• DOJ Vacancies
• Legal Careers at DOJ
  
  - Our Offices
• Find Help
• Contact Us
  
  Breadcrumb
  
  1. Justice.gov
• Civil Rights Division
• The Fair Housing Act
  
  The Fair Housing Act
  
  - Facebook
• X.
• LinkedIn.
• Email
  
  The Fair Housing Act, 42 U.S.C. 3601 et seq., prohibits discrimination by direct service providers of housing, such as proprietors and property business along with other entities, such as municipalities, banks or other loan provider and homeowners insurance provider whose inequitable practices make housing unavailable to individuals since of:
  
  race or color. faith. sex. national origin. familial status, or. impairment.
  
  In cases involving discrimination in mortgage loans or home improvement loans, the Department might file match under both the Fair Housing Act and the Equal Credit Opportunity Act. The Department brings cases where there is evidence of a pattern or practice of discrimination or where a denial of rights to a group of persons raises a problem of basic public importance. Where force or threat of force is used to deny or hinder reasonable housing rights, the Department of Justice might set up criminal proceedings. The Fair Housing Act also supplies treatments for dealing with individual complaints of discrimination. Individuals who believe that they have actually been victims of an unlawful housing practice, might file a complaint with the Department of Housing and Urban Development [HUD] or submit their own suit in federal or state court. The Department of Justice brings matches on behalf of individuals based on recommendations from HUD.
  
  Discrimination in Housing Based Upon Race or Color
  
  Among the central objectives of the Fair Housing Act, when Congress enacted it in 1968, was to prohibit race discrimination in sales and rentals of housing. Nevertheless, more than thirty years later on, race discrimination in housing continues to be a problem. The bulk of the Justice Department's pattern or practice cases include claims of race discrimination. Sometimes, housing companies attempt to camouflage their discrimination by providing false details about accessibility of housing, either stating that nothing was offered or steering homeseekers to specific locations based on race. Individuals who get such false information or misdirection might have no understanding that they have actually been victims of discrimination. The Department of Justice has brought numerous cases declaring this type of discrimination based on race or color. In addition, the Department's Fair Housing Testing Program looks for to reveal this sort of hidden discrimination and hold those responsible accountable. The majority of the mortgage loaning cases brought by the Department under the Fair Housing Act and Equal Credit Opportunity Act have actually alleged discrimination based upon race or color. Some of the Department's cases have actually likewise alleged that towns and other city government entities broke the Fair Housing Act when they rejected licenses or zoning changes for housing advancements, or relegated them to mainly minority areas, due to the fact that the potential residents were anticipated to be primarily African-Americans.
  
  Discrimination in Housing Based Upon Religion
  
  The Fair Housing Act forbids discrimination in housing based upon faith. This prohibition covers instances of obvious discrimination versus members of a specific faith too less direct actions, such as zoning regulations designed to limit the use of personal homes as a locations of praise. The variety of cases submitted given that 1968 alleging religious discrimination is small in comparison to a few of the other forbidden bases, such as race or national origin. The Act does include a limited exception that allows non-commercial housing run by a religious company to reserve such housing to persons of the very same religious beliefs.
  
  Discrimination in Housing Based Upon Sex, Including Sexual Harassment
  
  The Fair Housing Act makes it unlawful to discriminate in housing on the basis of sex. Recently, the Department's focus in this location has actually been to challenge unwanted sexual advances in housing. Women, particularly those who are bad, and with limited housing options, typically have little recourse but to tolerate the embarrassment and destruction of sexual harassment or threat having their households and themselves eliminated from their homes. The Department's enforcement program is intended at proprietors who create an illogical living environment by requiring sexual favors from occupants or by developing a sexually hostile environment for them. In this way we seek both to obtain relief for renters who have actually been dealt with unfairly by a property owner because of sex and also hinder other possible abusers by making it clear that they can not continue their conduct without facing consequences. In addition, prices discrimination in mortgage loaning may likewise negatively affect ladies, particularly minority women. This kind of discrimination is unlawful under both the Fair Housing Act and Equal Credit Opportunity Act.
  
  Discrimination in Housing Based Upon National Origin
  
  The Fair Housing Act prohibits discrimination based upon national origin. Such discrimination can be based either upon the nation of a person's birth or where his or her forefathers come from. Census information show that the Hispanic population is the fastest growing sector of our country's population. The Justice Department has actually taken enforcement action against municipal governments that have tried to decrease or restrict the variety of Hispanic households that may reside in their communities. We have sued lenders under both the Fair Housing Act and the Equal Credit Opportunity Act when they have actually enforced more stringent underwriting standards on mortgage or made loans on less beneficial terms for Hispanic borrowers. The Department has also taken legal action against loan providers for discrimination versus Native Americans. Other areas of the nation have experienced an increasing diversity of national origin groups within their populations. This includes new immigrants from Southeastern Asia, such as the Hmong, the previous Soviet Union, and other parts of Eastern Europe. We have done something about it versus personal property owners who have discriminated versus such people.
  
  Discrimination in Housing Based Upon Familial Status
  
  The Fair Housing Act, with some exceptions, prohibits discrimination in housing against households with kids under 18. In addition to forbiding an outright denial of housing to households with kids, the Act also avoids housing providers from enforcing any special requirements or conditions on occupants with custody of kids. For example, property owners may not locate families with children in any single portion of a complex, position an unreasonable restriction on the overall number of individuals who might live in a residence, or restrict their access to leisure services supplied to other occupants. In the majority of circumstances, the modified Fair Housing Act forbids a housing service provider from refusing to rent or offer to families with children. However, some centers may be designated as Housing for Older Persons (55 years of age). This type of housing, which satisfies the standards stated in the Housing for Older Persons Act of 1995, might operate as "senior" housing. The Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) has released regulations and additional guidance detailing these statutory requirements.
  
  Discrimination in Housing Based Upon Disability
  
  The Fair Housing Act forbids discrimination on the basis of special needs in all kinds of housing deals. The Act defines persons with a disability to imply those individuals with psychological or physical problems that substantially limit one or more major life activities. The term psychological or physical problems might include conditions such as loss of sight, hearing impairment, movement disability, HIV infection, psychological retardation, alcoholism, drug dependency, persistent fatigue, learning special needs, head injury, and mental disease. The term major life activity may include seeing, hearing, walking, breathing, carrying out manual jobs, looking after one's self, learning, speaking, or working. The Fair Housing Act likewise protects persons who have a record of such an impairment, or are considered as having such a problems. Current users of unlawful controlled compounds, individuals founded guilty for unlawful manufacture or distribution of a regulated compound, sex offenders, and juvenile transgressors are ruled out handicapped under the Fair Housing Act, by virtue of that status. The Fair Housing Act pays for no protections to individuals with or without disabilities who provide a direct threat to the individuals or residential or commercial property of others. Determining whether somebody presents such a direct hazard should be made on an individualized basis, however, and can not be based upon basic presumptions or speculation about the nature of a special needs. The Division's enforcement of the Fair Housing Act's protections for individuals with disabilities has actually focused on 2 significant areas. One is insuring that zoning and other regulations concerning land usage are not employed to prevent the domestic choices of these individuals, including needlessly restricting communal, or congregate, residential arrangements, such as group homes. The 2nd location is guaranteeing that newly constructed multifamily housing is integrated in accordance with the Fair Housing Act's accessibility requirements so that it is available to and usable by people with disabilities, and, in specific, those who utilize wheelchairs. There are other federal statutes that restrict discrimination versus people with disabilities, including the Americans with Disabilities Act, which is implemented by the Disability Rights Section of the Civil Rights Division.
  
  Discrimination in Housing Based Upon Disability Group Homes
  
  Some individuals with disabilities might cohabit in congregate living plans, frequently described as "group homes." The Fair Housing Act prohibits towns and other city government entities from making zoning or land use choices or executing land usage policies that exclude or otherwise discriminate versus individuals with specials needs. The Fair Housing Act makes it illegal--
  
  - To utilize land use policies or actions that treat groups of individuals with impairments less positively than groups of non-disabled individuals. An example would be an ordinance restricting housing for persons with specials needs or a particular kind of special needs, such as mental disorder, from finding in a specific area, while permitting other groups of unrelated individuals to cohabit because location.
• To act versus, or deny an authorization, for a home because of the impairment of people who live or would live there. An example would be rejecting a structure permit for a home due to the fact that it was intended to provide housing for individuals with psychological retardation.
• To refuse to clear up lodgings in land usage and zoning policies and treatments where such accommodations may be required to pay for individuals or groups of persons with disabilities a level playing field to utilize and delight in housing. What makes up a sensible lodging is a case-by-case decision. Not all asked for modifications of rules or policies are sensible. If an asked for modification imposes an excessive financial or administrative problem on a local government, or if an adjustment creates an essential modification in a regional government's land use and zoning plan, it is not a "affordable" accommodation.
  
  Discrimination in Housing Based Upon Disability-- Accessibility Features for New Construction
  
  The Fair Housing Act defines discrimination in housing against individuals with disabilities to consist of a failure "to create and construct" certain brand-new multi-family houses so that they are accessible to and functional by persons with specials needs, and especially individuals who use wheelchairs. The Act needs all recently built multi-family homes of 4 or more systems intended for very first occupancy after March 13, 1991, to have specific functions: an accessible entrance on an accessible route, accessible common and public use locations, doors adequately wide to accommodate wheelchairs, accessible routes into and through each home, light switches, electrical outlets, and thermostats in available place, supports in restroom walls to accommodate grab bar setups, and functional kitchen areas and restrooms set up so that a wheelchair can steer about the area.
  
  Developers, builders, owners, and designers responsible for the style or building and construction of brand-new multi-family housing may be held responsible under the Fair Housing Act if their structures fail to satisfy these design requirements. The Department of Justice has actually lots of enforcement actions versus those who failed to do so. Most of the cases have actually been fixed by approval decrees offering a range of types of relief, consisting of: retrofitting to bring inaccessible features into compliance where practical and where it is not-- options (monetary funds or other building requirements) that will offer making other housing systems available